Epson has been making quality printers for years. The team of Yourprinterguru after using Epson 2800 and Epson 2850 has come up with a comparison. These two Ecotank printers are superb in every way possible. However, undoubtedly, one is a little better than the other. In this Epson 2800 vs 2850 comparison, let’s find out which one is ideal for you and why.

The Epson ET-2800 and ET-2850 are similar all-in-one printers with 4 ink tanks each. Both offer borderless printing, WiFi connectivity, and a 1.44-inch LCD display. While the ET-2800 has a higher printing resolution (5760 x 1440 dpi), the ET-2850 provides larger borderless print sizes (8.5″ x 11″).

Epson EcoTank 2800 vs 2850 Specs

SpecsEpson ET-2800Epson ET-2850
Ink Tank Number44
Ink Colors1 x Cyan1 x Magenta1 x Yellow1 x Black1 x Cyan1 x Magenta1 x Yellow1 x Black
Printing Resolution5760 x 1440 dpi4800 x 1200
Scanning Resolution1200 dpi2400 dpi
Copy Resolution600 x 600 dpi600 x 600 dpi
Borderless PrintingYesYes
Borderless Print Size4″ x 6″8.5” x 11”
Maximum Print Size8.5″ x 14″8.5″ x 14″
Print Speed10 ppm Mono5 ppm color10.5 ppm Mono5 ppm color
Copy Speed7.7 cpm mono3.8 cpm color7.7 cpm mono3.8 cpm color
Paper Handling100 sheets input30 sheets output100 sheets10 envelopes
Special Media SupportYesYes
ConnectivityWifi, USB, Windows, MacWifi, USB, Windows, Mac
Cost Per Page0.3 cents mono 0.9 color0.3 cents mono 0.9 color
Item Weight8.8 lb11.9 lb
Dimension22.8 x 14.8 x 10″22.3 x 14.8 x 10.2″ 
Direct SD Card PrintingNoNo
Display Size & Type1.44 inch LCD display1.44 inch LCD display

Epson Ecotank 2800 vs 2850 Compared

Epson 2800 vs 2850

Box Contents

Both printers came with the same accessories: the printers, refillable ink bottles, and a power cord. However, the ink bottle capacities were different – 127 ml for black ink and 70 ml for each of the CMY (Cyan, Magenta, Yellow) bottles. In short, the unboxing experience was good just like any other Epson Printers.

Design and Build Quality

Epson printers always come with a sturdy build quality, These two printers are also no exception. Both of them come with a plastic build. In hand feel of them is superb. They both look somewhat identical to us. However, there are a few differences between these two in terms of design and look, We felt, the Epson ET-2850 comes with a better build quality.

Printer Resolution

The ET-2800 has a better resolution, printing at a maximum of 5760 x 1440 dpi, while the ET-2850 supports only 4800 x 1200 dpi. It might seem odd that the slightly more expensive printer has a lower resolution, but in reality, affordable things can still provide good features and a decent experience.

Borderless Printing

For borderless printing, we suggest the ET-2850, as it can print borderless documents up to letter size and smaller. On the other hand, we only managed to print borderless photos with the ET-2800.

Also Check- Epson Eco Tank 2760 Vs 3760 Compared

Print Quality

The ET-2800 has better resolution, but for excellent print quality and accurate colors, we recommend the ET-2850. Its print quality and color accuracy were outstanding, especially when we sublimated vibrant colors on t-shirts. However, that doesn’t mean we won’t use the ET-2800 for basic printing—it’s a good starter printer for home and office. For sublimation printing, both of them are good.

Duplex Printing

For home and office use, we recommend the Epson ET-2850—it supports two-sided printing, unlike the ET-2800. Because of its cheap pricing, the Epson ET-2850 lacks this feature. If your main thing is printing photos, then the ET-2800 should be good for you.

Epson 2800 vs 2850 – Which One Is Better?

Since the Epson ET-2800 is a basic printer, it doesn’t have duplex printing. For auto two-sided printing and wider borderless prints, go for the ET-2850. If your budget is on the lower side, the ET-2800 is a great option—it’s cheaper upfront and in the long run.

Prabir Mandal

Prabir is the founder of He has been using printers for more than a decade now. He has opened this blog to share his knowledge and experiences about printers.

Leave a Reply